The real reason Trump hates Zelensky [OPINION]

Who’s afraid of Volodymyr Zelensky? Donald Trump and the Republican Party, that’s who. So much so that they have insulted and demonized the diminutive Ukrainian president as if he were the embodiment of evil.

Trump called Zelensky “the greatest salesman in history“

Viktor Orbán, Hungary’s authoritarian prime minister, cavorts with Trump in Mar-a-Lago and no eyebrows are raised. Vladimir Putin routinely kills his opponents and tries to interfere with American elections, and Republican outrage is at best muted. But poor Zelensky visits an ammunitions plant in Pennsylvania, and he and Oksana Markarova, the Ukrainian ambassador to Washington, are attacked for interfering in America’s elections.

House Speaker Mike Johnson is demanding that Zelensky fire Markarova.

The conservative response to Zelensky in general and during his visit to the U.S. in particular is, at best, completely asymmetric. (Recall Tucker Carlson’s characterization of Zelensky as “far closer to Lenin than to George Washington.”) What is really going on here?

Given the GOP’s transformation into a pliant arm of Trump, there’s little point in analyzing the views about Zelensky held by the party, its leaders and its followers. Trump, and his perceptions and self-perceptions, are all that matters.

Trump’s rhetoric makes clear that he feels threatened by Zelensky, whom he has called “the greatest salesman in history. Every time he comes into the country, he walks away with 60 billion dollars.”

Trump’s choice of the word “salesman” is obviously derogatory, the implication being that Zelensky is, like a used car salesman, pulling a fast one on naive Americans.

More important is Trump’s acknowledgment that Zelensky is the greatest salesman “in history.” We all know that the greatest dealmaker in history — and a dealmaker is just a glorified version of a salesman — is none other than Trump himself. Indeed, Trump is a genius, the smartest and best dealmaker, president, entrepreneur and so on, at least in his own mind.

In effect, Trump is admitting that Zelensky is too good at what he does, too is deserving of the world crown in dealmaking.

Trump’s goal is to present Ukraine as a hopeless case

Zelensky, in short, is a threat. As Trump recently put it, “The president of Ukraine is in our country. He is making little nasty aspersions toward your favorite president — me.”

There can be only one favorite, just as there can be only one genius — and that person cannot be some little Ukrainian upstart.

The real reason Trump hates Zelensky [OPINION]
Volodymyr Zelensky during the meeting with Kamala Harris in the USA. Photo: president.gov.ua

How best to disarm Zelensky? It would make sense to focus on rational discourse focusing on Zelensky’s weaknesses — and there are many, as Ukrainians would be more than happy to point out. But that would be completely out of character for Trump, because genuine criticism presupposes knowledge.

Far better, then, to discredit the country that Zelensky represents by making outlandish and patently false claims about it. To that end, here’s what Trump said about Ukraine at a recent campaign rally: “Those gorgeous buildings with golden towers are demolished and laying broken on their side. You’ll never see that kind of a town or city again. They’ll never be duplicated. They’re all demolished, other than Kyiv. You’ll never be able to rebuild the cities or towns the way they are — impossible to do. They were thousands of years old. And just think about it, just three years ago, you had a beautiful civilization. Millions of people that were living that are not with us any longer.”

Ukrainians may feel flattered by Trump’s assertion that they have a unique civilization, but just about everything else in that statement is either exaggerated or false. And that’s precisely the point. Trump’s goal is to present Ukraine as a hopeless basket case and Zelensky, its consummate “salesman,” as a peddler of junk.

It follows that the U.S. has no interest in rescuing junk. And unlike Biden and Harris, who “won’t be satisfied until they send American kids over to Ukraine,” Trump knows that “the moms and dads of America don’t want their kids fighting Ukraine and Russia, and we’re not going to have our soldiers die across the ocean.”

It matters little that no one has even hinted at American soldiers being sent to Ukraine. The point is quite different, that no one, least of all Americans, should fall for Zelensky’s salesmanship and buy a jalopy from “the greatest salesman in history.”

Instead they should only (and indiscriminately) buy whatever Trump, the greatest genius in human history, is selling.

Photo: president.gov.ua

About the Author: Dr. Alexander Motyl

Dr. Alexander Motyl is a professor of political science at Rutgers-Newark. A specialist on Ukraine, Russia, and the USSR, and on nationalism, revolutions, empires, and theory, he is the author of 10 books of nonfiction, including Pidsumky imperii (2009); Puti imperii (2004); Imperial Ends: The Decay, Collapse, and Revival of Empires (2001); Revolutions, Nations, Empires: Conceptual Limits and Theoretical Possibilities (1999); Dilemmas of Independence: Ukraine after Totalitarianism (1993); and The Turn to the Right: The Ideological Origins and Development of Ukrainian Nationalism, 1919–1929 (1980); the editor of 15 volumes, including The Encyclopedia of Nationalism (2000) and The Holodomor Reader (2012); and a contributor of dozens of articles to academic and policy journals, newspaper op-ed pages, and magazines.

He also has a weekly blog, “Ukraine’s Orange Blues.” The text you just read was published in The Hill.

Hot this week

Ukraine’s soldiers seek revenge against Putin’s forces in Kursk: ‘We laughed digging trenches on enemy soil’

From crippling bridges bringing supplies to Russia’s troops to defending the territory they have snatched in daring raids, soldiers resting in Ukraine’s border Sumy region tell Askold Krushelnycky they want to push on.

Propaganda surrounding the assassination attempt on Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico

After the assassination attempt on Robert Fico, the propaganda inherent in such cases was basically immediately launched. Wszelaka. We followed it through.

In Kursk, Putin is learning that historical revanchism cuts both ways [OPINION]

Ukrainians may decide to celebrate the liberation of their former capital. Historical revanchism cuts both ways.

The Kremlin fears that the West is trying to break Russia apart. If only! [OPINION]

Russia’s stony-faced foreign minister is getting paranoid. Sergei Lavrov believes that “at present, about 50 countries are trying to break up Russia.” The West is the Kremlin's worst enemy.

I’ve witnessed first-hand the horrific cost of Putin’s war – as casualties hit 1 million

The combined number of casualties on both sides in Russia’s war against Ukraine has reached the ghastly 1 million mark, according to a media report. The tally of deaths in Europe’s largest conflict since the Second World War.

President of Kazakhstan Tokayev Delivered Putin a Message Written in Beijing

During talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday, July 25, in Omsk, Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev proposed freezing the war in Ukraine. However, Estonian publicist Andrei Kuzichkin believes that, in reality, Kazakhstan’s president was conveying a message to Putin from Xi Jinping. The question remains whether Putin is capable of interpreting it correctly – and there are serious doubts about that.

Technology Has Changed Warfare. Will Western Leaders Draw the Right Conclusions from Valerii Zaluzhnyi’s Analysis?

On July 8, 2026, another article by Valerii Zaluzhnyi was published. The central thesis of the article is that advances in military technology require a fundamental reassessment of conventional ideas about war, including the very concept of military victory. Are Western leaders, who bear responsibility for the fate of their nations, prepared to draw the necessary conclusions and rethink their strategic vision of war?

Is the State an Instrument of Law or an Apparatus of Violence? Russia, Poland, and Ukraine: Historical Contradictions Can Be Overcome, but Civilizational Ones Cannot

At the core of political conflicts between Poland and Ukraine lies a divergent understanding of history. However, these contradictions can be overcome if historical disputes are not politicized but are instead approached through a shared understanding of the state as an instrument of the legal system designed to ensure normal social life. Political contradictions with Russia, however, are fundamentally irreconcilable. Even if enlightened liberals were to come to power in Russia, they would not be able to change the historical fact that Russia developed as a militarized state whose essence is not law but a mechanism of violence.

Alexander Lukashenko: Putin’s hostage despot

Alexander Lukashenko, who ruled Belarus for nearly 32 years through extremist state terror is now trapped by inescapable forces. Between his economic and military dependence on Moscow and the existential threats from his own population, he finds his survival at the mercy of factors beyond his clutch.

National Identity and the Diplomatic Conflict Between Poland and Ukraine

Is the diplomatic conflict between Poland and Ukraine purely ideological, or is it rooted in questions of national identity? Dr. Yulia Fil, a culturologist, offers an academic answer free of political judgments.

Sexual Humiliation as an Instrument of Russian Military Policy

Only in relatively recent times in democratic countries have sexual relations come to be understood primarily as a sphere of personal freedom and individual choice. Such an approach is unacceptable to the contemporary Russian authorities, which in their attitude toward sexuality demonstrate not merely conservatism but a drive to revive the most primitive forms of social control. As a result, sexual humiliation becomes one of the instruments used to maintain the system of power and to mobilize society for war.

US Troops in Poland: Who Really Calls the Shots in the White House?

US troops stationed in Europe serve as an important deterrent against potential Russian aggression. Withdrawing these troops from Poland and other countries would not only weaken their defensive capabilities but would also signal that Washington is unwilling to deter future Russian aggression.

The Messianic Idea of Russia. Article Two. Is Russia’s Greatness More Important Than One’s Own Religion and the Lives of Fellow Believers?

Before the war, Russian Orthodox Christians, Protestants, Muslims, and Vaishnavas communicated with their fellow believers in Ukraine, recognizing a shared identity. Yet when faced with the choice between supporting a war against a neighboring people and preserving fellowship with their Ukrainian co-believers, most of them chose the war. Is it possible to change their minds? How did it happen that the messianic idea of Russia became more important to them not only than the lives of their fellow believers, but even than their own religion?
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img