Ukraine’s troops seek revenge on Russia with long-range strikes: ‘We want to inflict a lot of damage’ [The Independent]

Askold Krushelnycky speaks to a colonel who says Kyiv’s forces need to inflict as much pain on Vladimir Putin’s army as quickly as they can. “Hopefully we will be able to upset Russia’s plans by inflicting a lot of damage on troop concentrations and arms depots”.

That is the reaction of a Ukrainian colonel – with close links to the army’s top brass – to news that Joe Biden had lifted the restriction on US-supplied long-range missiles being used to target Vladimir Putin’s forces deep inside Russia after months of pleas from Kyiv. A few hours later, on the 1,000th day of the invasion, Moscow claimed the first use of the US Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) ballistic missiles on the Bryansk region of Russia, about 80 miles from the Ukraine border. The missiles have a full range of around 190 miles.

Ukraine’s General Staff of the armed forces said before the statement from Russia’s Foreign Ministry that the Ukrainian army carried out a strike on the arsenal of the 1046th Logistics Support Centre in the area of Karachev in Bryansk region of Russia. The General Staff said that multiple explosions and detonationd were heard in the targeted area, without saying what weapons had been used.

“The destruction of ammunition depots for the Russian occupying forces, aimed at ending Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine, will continue,” the statement said. Ukrainian media, including RBC-Ukraine, cited a source saying: “Indeed, for the first time, we used ATACMS to strike Russian territory. The strike was carried out against a facility in the Bryansk region, and it was successfully hit”. Moscow claimed that the missiles were shot out of the sky, or damaged, with falling debris causing a fire.

“It’s better late than never and a positive development,” the Ukrainian colonel told The Independent.

“But a key issue is how many ATACMS will the US provide. The US can [also] programme the range the missiles can fly – so another important step is what distance they will allow the missiles to strike.”

There were reports on Sunday that Initially permission for their use is believed to be limited to the Russian region of Kursk, next to Bryansk, where Ukrainian forces established a foothold after a surprise assault in August.

According to intelligence reports by Kyiv and its Western allies, Russia is preparing to launch a large offensive in an attempt to eject the Ukrainian army from Kursk.

Kyiv wants to use long-range missiles to counter an anticipated attack by tens of thousands of Russian forces in Kursk, bolstered by an estimated 10,000 North Korean troops – a number which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said could reach 100,000 – to retake the territory captured by Ukraine.

“We will be able to disrupt Russia’s expected push in Kursk where we have seen their forces gathering 50,0000 plus troops,” the colonel said about using the US-supplied missiles inside Russia.

The Ukrainians also hope that Biden’s move will open the way to lifting all restrictions on how Kyiv can use Western-provided weapons including the Anglo-French Storm Shadows that have also been subject to restrictions. British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron are both keen to allow Ukraine to use Storm Shadow (called Scalp by France) inside Russia, but given the missiles use US guidance systems, Washington will also need to agree to that.

“We are waiting to see what Britain and France do with permission for us to use Storm Shadow inside Russia,” said The Independent‘s source. “We know they want us to be able to use their missiles for long-range strikes into Russia and hope that America will give us the necessary permission.”

Kremlin Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the US is “adding fuel to the fire” and reiterated Russian President Putin’s claims from September that Ukrainian strikes against Russia using Western-provided weapons would represent an escalation and directly involve Western countries in the war. On Tuesday, Putin lowered the threshold for a nuclear strike in response to a broader range of conventional attacks. In a clear reference to Ukraine and the United States, the doctrine said any attack by a non-nuclear power supported by a nuclear power would be considered a joint attack. Any attack by one member of a military bloc would be considered an attack by the entire alliance, it said.

Russia has for months been pressing Ukrainian troops hard all along the 600-mile front lines in Ukraine and in the Russian territory Kyiv occupied in the Kursk area. Moscow, despite losing, by Ukrainian estimates, an average of some 1,200 daily dead and wounded, has been making incremental advances.

The colonel and other sources told The Independent that despite the staggering casualties, Putin will likely continue, and perhaps even intensify, the attacks up to the inauguration of Donald Trump in January, because Moscow perceives that would give it more leverage in any peace negotiations initiated by the incoming US president.

Over the weekend, Russia launched some of its largest air raids since its invasion began in February 2022, using drones, missiles and glide bombs against Ukrainian energy infrastructure, leaving many civilians dead.

Trump said many times during his election campaign that, as president, he would end the conflict within a day. But he has not explained how he would achieve that.

America is Ukraine’s most important supplier of weapons and ammunition and many in Kyiv and its allies fear Trump would try to force Ukraine into a disadvantageous ceasefire – where it would have to cede territory occupied by Russia – by threatening to cut off supplies to Ukraine.

Moves to lift restrictions on Ukraine have been criticised by some in Trump’s camp who say it will make efforts to end the war more difficult and put the world on the path to global war..

The man Trump wants as his national security adviser, Republican Congressman Mike Walz called it “another step up the escalation ladder.”

It is unknown how many ATACMS Ukraine possesses. They are launched using platforms like the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS). But it is unlikely that Kyiv’s stock of the expensive missiles is plentiful.

The colonel said that Kyiv knows that it cannot rely indefinitely on others for its supplies, especially when there is uncertainty over Trump’s intentions, and that Ukraine is working rapidly to develop its own long-range missiles that would put Moscow within range.

The text you just read was published in The Independent.

Photo: pixabay.com

Ukraine’s troops seek revenge on Russia with long-range strikes: ‘We want to inflict a lot of damage’ [The Independent]

Hot this week

Ukraine’s soldiers seek revenge against Putin’s forces in Kursk: ‘We laughed digging trenches on enemy soil’

From crippling bridges bringing supplies to Russia’s troops to defending the territory they have snatched in daring raids, soldiers resting in Ukraine’s border Sumy region tell Askold Krushelnycky they want to push on.

Propaganda surrounding the assassination attempt on Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico

After the assassination attempt on Robert Fico, the propaganda inherent in such cases was basically immediately launched. Wszelaka. We followed it through.

In Kursk, Putin is learning that historical revanchism cuts both ways [OPINION]

Ukrainians may decide to celebrate the liberation of their former capital. Historical revanchism cuts both ways.

The Kremlin fears that the West is trying to break Russia apart. If only! [OPINION]

Russia’s stony-faced foreign minister is getting paranoid. Sergei Lavrov believes that “at present, about 50 countries are trying to break up Russia.” The West is the Kremlin's worst enemy.

I’ve witnessed first-hand the horrific cost of Putin’s war – as casualties hit 1 million

The combined number of casualties on both sides in Russia’s war against Ukraine has reached the ghastly 1 million mark, according to a media report. The tally of deaths in Europe’s largest conflict since the Second World War.

Alexander Lukashenko: Putin’s hostage despot

Alexander Lukashenko, who ruled Belarus for nearly 32 years through extremist state terror is now trapped by inescapable forces. Between his economic and military dependence on Moscow and the existential threats from his own population, he finds his survival at the mercy of factors beyond his clutch.

National Identity and the Diplomatic Conflict Between Poland and Ukraine

Is the diplomatic conflict between Poland and Ukraine purely ideological, or is it rooted in questions of national identity? Dr. Yulia Fil, a culturologist, offers an academic answer free of political judgments.

Sexual Humiliation as an Instrument of Russian Military Policy

Only in relatively recent times in democratic countries have sexual relations come to be understood primarily as a sphere of personal freedom and individual choice. Such an approach is unacceptable to the contemporary Russian authorities, which in their attitude toward sexuality demonstrate not merely conservatism but a drive to revive the most primitive forms of social control. As a result, sexual humiliation becomes one of the instruments used to maintain the system of power and to mobilize society for war.

US Troops in Poland: Who Really Calls the Shots in the White House?

US troops stationed in Europe serve as an important deterrent against potential Russian aggression. Withdrawing these troops from Poland and other countries would not only weaken their defensive capabilities but would also signal that Washington is unwilling to deter future Russian aggression.

The Messianic Idea of Russia. Article Two. Is Russia’s Greatness More Important Than One’s Own Religion and the Lives of Fellow Believers?

Before the war, Russian Orthodox Christians, Protestants, Muslims, and Vaishnavas communicated with their fellow believers in Ukraine, recognizing a shared identity. Yet when faced with the choice between supporting a war against a neighboring people and preserving fellowship with their Ukrainian co-believers, most of them chose the war. Is it possible to change their minds? How did it happen that the messianic idea of Russia became more important to them not only than the lives of their fellow believers, but even than their own religion?

The St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, Ukrainian Drones, and an Out-of-Touch Putin

The St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), held from June 3 to June 6, 2026, and intended to showcase Vladimir Putin's international stature, opened and closed against a backdrop of smoke from Ukrainian drone attacks. On the morning of June 3, the forum's opening day, a major fire broke out at the St. Petersburg Oil Terminal. On June 6, the day the forum concluded, the attacks were repeated. But what did Vladimir Putin's conduct at the forum actually reveal?

Russia’s Information War in Africa: Africans Are Going to Fight Against Ukraine

Russia itself – now attempting to reclaim its former colonial possessions by military force – that is associated in many African countries with the struggle against colonialism. Alongside its military presence, Russia has been expanding its informational influence in Africa and recruiting mercenaries there to fight against Ukraine

Russia’s Messianic Idea. Article One. The Baltic States Under Threat

Western intelligence services still do not see signs of preparations for an attack on the Baltic states, and a number of political and economic arguments can be made against such a scenario. However, there is another argument that is often overlooked – Russia’s messianic goal-setting, which is what brought a man like Putin to power.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img