“After Munich, Russia declares Putin’s diplomatic success, and the USA is accused of colonialism [REPORT]”

The Munich Summit and planned peace talks regarding Ukraine are not currently going as the USA had hoped. President Volodymyr Zelensky, although initially agreeing to a deal with the White House for access to billions of dollars worth of rare mineral deposits located, among others, in the Donbas region, admitted to journalists at the Munich Summit that he had rejected most of Donald Trump’s peace proposals. Why?

Munich Summit a victory for Putin?

Many experts believe that the USA, in its proposals for a ceasefire in Ukraine, is more siding with the aggressor than the victim, while Kremlin-controlled media are even declaring Putin’s diplomatic success.

The pro-Kremlin channel NTV aired reports suggesting that after Trump’s conversation with Putin, Kyiv’s position had been undermined, European allies of Ukraine “were excluded, and the leaders of Russia and the United States would agree on everything between themselves.”

“After his conversation with the Russian leader, Trump called Kyiv. He spoke with Zelensky for about an hour, and afterward, Trump wrote that the conversation also went well. Importantly, Trump spoke with Zelensky after his conversation with Putin. Therefore, when the American president summed up this day of major telephone diplomacy at the White House, he was asked whether it seemed that Zelensky had been sidelined from the negotiations,” suggested NTV correspondent Oleksiy Veselovsky.

This is a visible change, as Russian media had previously been rather restrained in commenting on the American openness to negotiations with Russia, suspecting a trick by the Trump administration that would leave the Kremlin in an unfavorable position after any potential peace agreements or even before such an act.

Thus, despite the current enthusiasm of Russian state-controlled media, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov are issuing cautious statements, downplaying possible pro-Russian shifts in Trump’s policy. At the same time, Putin publicly congratulated the US president, praising his character and seemingly downplaying the threat of further sanctions, but also reaffirming his readiness for dialogue.

Na zdj. sztab Ukrainy podczas spotkania z grupą przedstawicieli rządu USA w Monachium 14 lutego 2025 roku. Fot. Biuro Prezydenta Ukrainy, Munich
Na zdj. sztab Ukrainy podczas spotkania z grupą przedstawicieli rządu USA w Monachium 14 lutego 2025 roku. Fot. Biuro Prezydenta Ukrainy

Europe sidelined. Trump and Putin make the decisions

This situation is beginning to worry Europe, as it appears that Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin have decided to settle everything between themselves, completely bypassing all other parties: both Ukraine itself and the European Union. That’s why French President Emmanuel Macron has proposed convening a special summit on Ukraine, which would be held in Paris and aimed at developing a joint stance.

According to Reuters, citing four European diplomatic sources, an informal meeting could even take place today.

We learned about the preparation for such a summit on Saturday evening from statements made by Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski. He said that the French president “is calling European leaders to Paris.”

“President Trump has a method of working that the Russians call reconnaissance-in-force: you start acting and see what happens, then you adjust your position. And we [in Europe] must respond to this,” said the Polish minister, referring to the phone conversation between the US president and the Russian president.

The Élysée Palace has not yet issued an official statement regarding the summit, but some European leaders have already hinted that they may participate. One of them is British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. He declared that this is a “unique moment crucial for national security” and that Europe must play a more active role in NATO. “The United Kingdom will work to maintain the unity of the US and Europe,” Starmer added.

After the European summit, Starmer plans to discuss its outcomes with Trump. Their meeting is expected to take place in Washington at the end of February. After his return from Washington, another summit with European leaders and Volodymyr Zelensky is expected to take place, according to BBC.

Prezydent Wołodymyr Zełeński z unijnymi politykami podczas szczytu w Monachium. Fot. Biuro Prezydenta Ukrainy, Munich
Prezydent Wołodymyr Zełeński z unijnymi politykami podczas szczytu w Monachium. Fot. Biuro Prezydenta Ukrainy

Ukraine’s lithium deposits to remain in the hands of future generations

Due to the uncertainties and unclear stance of the USA, President Zelensky has started to seek allies in Europe again. According to Trump’s announcements, it is Europe that would bear the burden of continuing to support Ukraine’s war efforts.

Moreover, according to the authorities in Kyiv, the USA is demanding a lot but offering little in return. Hence the negative attitude towards signing any economic agreements. Zelensky does not believe that even if he agreed to give the USA 50% of the revenues from lithium, graphite, uranium, or oil and gas mines, the Americans would actually keep their promise of security guarantees for his country and continue to supply the weapons necessary to defend against Russia.

Read also: Dr. Oleksandr Maslak. The founder of the party and the chief ideologist of Azov was killed by a truck carrying logs. Before his death, he gave us an interview. Here it is

“The plan President Trump is offering us is not ready and does not protect our interests,” Volodymyr Zelensky commented during a conversation with journalists at the Munich Security Conference. “I don’t yet see any connection to security guarantees in this document. It is not in our interest today. It is not in the interest of a sovereign Ukraine.”

“I am only the president and manager of my country. After my term, there will be another manager. These resources are not mine. They belong to our people, and I intend to ensure that they remain in the hands of our children,” the President of Ukraine told journalists.

Prezydent Ukrainy podczas konferencji prasowej w Monachium. Fot. Biuro Prezydenta Ukrainy, Munich
Prezydent Ukrainy podczas konferencji prasowej w Monachium. Fot. Biuro Prezydenta Ukrainy

New Colonialism by the USA vs. Oligarchs

European diplomats argue that the US proposal reeks of colonialism, reminiscent of the era when Western countries exploited smaller or weaker nations, trading them and their resources on an industrial scale.

A Ukrainian official and energy expert, familiar with the proposal, told the BBC that it gives the United States the right to half of Ukraine’s revenue from resource extraction, as well as the right to sell new extraction licenses. Part of the money from the extraction would be invested in Ukraine’s reconstruction.

According to a list compiled by the Kyiv School of Economics, Ukraine possesses 109 significant mineral resource deposits, including titanium, lithium, and uranium ores, as well as oil and natural gas deposits. However, some of these are located in areas occupied by Russia or near the front lines.

Their value is uncertain. As the New York Times writes, apart from the risk of a second Russian invasion after a ceasefire, investments in these resources have been hindered for much of the post-independence period due to deeply ingrained issues in Ukraine’s business climate.

This includes secret regulations and insider trading conducted by Ukrainian oligarchs, businessmen, and politicians, which could limit any profits from this transaction. That’s why, even before the war, few investors participated in Ukraine’s mining deals.

"After Munich, Russia declares Putin's diplomatic success, and the USA is accused of colonialism [REPORT]"

Hot this week

Ukraine’s soldiers seek revenge against Putin’s forces in Kursk: ‘We laughed digging trenches on enemy soil’

From crippling bridges bringing supplies to Russia’s troops to defending the territory they have snatched in daring raids, soldiers resting in Ukraine’s border Sumy region tell Askold Krushelnycky they want to push on.

Propaganda surrounding the assassination attempt on Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico

After the assassination attempt on Robert Fico, the propaganda inherent in such cases was basically immediately launched. Wszelaka. We followed it through.

In Kursk, Putin is learning that historical revanchism cuts both ways [OPINION]

Ukrainians may decide to celebrate the liberation of their former capital. Historical revanchism cuts both ways.

The Kremlin fears that the West is trying to break Russia apart. If only! [OPINION]

Russia’s stony-faced foreign minister is getting paranoid. Sergei Lavrov believes that “at present, about 50 countries are trying to break up Russia.” The West is the Kremlin's worst enemy.

I’ve always dreamed of crossing the Russian border on a Ukrainian tank – now I’ve done it

In a career which has spanned four decades, journalist Askold Krushelnycky has seen first-hand the brutality of the Russian regime. This time he had a chance to cross the Russian border.

The Ideological Concept of Russian Culture Amid the War: What Should We Do with It?

How should we relate to Russian culture today, from the perspective of the war that Russia is waging against Ukraine?

Gen. Krzysztof Nolbert for PostPravda.Info: Atlanticism — New Challenges, Same Values

Atlanticism and its new challenges involve reconciling the global economy, mutual influences and limitations with a globalized and often excessively interconnected system, all while taking into account the national interests of many states. What hopes and risks come with this?

What Is Identity and Why Do Russians See It Only as an Ideological Construct?

One of the mistakes made by the Russian authorities, who expected to gain the support of the local population after invading Ukraine, stems from their failure to understand Ukrainian identity and the fact that identity cannot be imposed as an ideological construct.

The Aggressive Political Myth of the Kremlin Is More Than Just Fake News and Disinformation

The aggressive political myth used to justify war – not only against Ukraine but against the entire Western civilization – penetrates much deeper into the public consciousness than Kremlin propaganda, disinformation, or fake news.

How does the Ideology of modern Russia differ from that of the Soviet Union?

If Soviet ideology was monolithic, the current ideology of the Russian authorities appears loose, combining seemingly incompatible elements – for example, the cultivation of the Soviet past alongside the idealization of Tsarist Russia. Nevertheless, Russian propaganda has shown significant success, attracting a wide range of political forces, sometimes even those hostiles to each other. This demonstrates that modern Russian ideology functions differently from the Soviet one

Life Under Shelling. Donbas 2014–2025. An Eyewitness’s Notes

War constantly changes its nature, and so does the life of people living under shelling. Only one thing remains unchanged – the constant threat of losing one’s home, being maimed, or killed. As an eyewitness, Nikolai Karpitsky gives an account of life in the Donbas frontline zone over the course of ten years.

“The ‘Seals’ and Bulgaria: Russian Disinformation. How the Myth of ‘Ukrainian Tourists’ Was Born [INVESTIGATION]

While browsing pro-Kremlin media, I come across reports about Ukrainian refugees who supposedly refuse to leave Bulgaria’s luxurious Black Sea resorts — and I discover that similar stories (about Ukrainian refugees in Baltic resorts) are also appearing in Poland, mainly on social media and in nationalist pamphlets.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img