The Peace Summit in Switzerland has ended. And what now?

The Peace Summit in Switzerland did not bring a breakthrough in the war in Ukraine. Nearly 100 countries and international organizations took part in it and finally, a joint declaration was signed, regarding further actions towards the conflict in Ukraine. But not all summit participants, at the end decided to support the common declaration.

A statement rather than a peacemaking strategy

The Vatican, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, India, Mexico, South Africa, Brazil, the United Arab Emirates, Armenia and Libya did not agree with the decisions of the Peace Summit in Switzerland. At the same time, it must be admitted that these conclusions are neither surprising nor groundbreaking in any way. It seems that the lack of leading global players, i.e. China and Russia, doomed the talks to failure.

All the more so because the day before the meeting started, Putin proposed his conditions. Full dependence of Ukraine on Russia and annexation of all currently occupied territories.

The 80 countries that signed the declaration after the Peace Summit agreed that all prisoners of war, civilians and illegally displaced children must be returned to their homes. In order to publicize the problem of Ukrainian prisoners of war, who have been staying in camps in Russia for over two years, the families of the Defenders of Mariupol and Azovstal came to show their pain and worries to Lucerne in Switzerland, as we reported on PostPravda social media.

Russia should also provide Ukraine with free access to sea ports in the Sea of ​​Azov and the Black Sea, and the nuclear power plant in Zaporizhia should return to Kyiv’s control. Moreover, the Russian Federation should allow Ukraine to trade grain freely. It was also decided that any nuclear attack on Ukraine was unacceptable.

The full text of the statement was published on the official website of the President of Ukraine.

These are by no means concrete plans for peace. We can even suspect that they are only ad hoc appeals to Moscow, which has no real intention of ending the war. Rzeczywistość wygląda zupełnie odwrotnie. On the day of the beginning of the Peace Summit, the Russians attacked with increased force in the direction of Pokrovsk . One of the largest cities in the region, located on the administrative borders of the Donetsk oblast.

Russia will receive an invitation to the next Summit

After the Summit in Switzerland, President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky added that a specific peace plan would be prepared in the near future. Then Russia will also be invited to the next meeting. “Russia’s presence at the next Peace Summit will indicate that they have finally decided to end the war,” said the president of Ukraine, quoted by the BBC. He added that “negotiations between countries may start earlier. But only on condition that the Russian Federation withdraws its troops from Ukraine.”

In his opinion, on the eve of the summit, Vladimir Putin made a mistake. When he began to demand that Ukraine leave the controlled territories as a condition for starting peace talks. “This statement,” the Ukrainian president emphasized, “has significantly changed the opinion of many world leaders. With this one message, Putin told the whole world that his previous declarations about the desire to end the war can easily be multiplied by zero.

Russia did not participate in the Summit in Switzerland because The Kremlin was not invited by the meeting organizers. China, in turn, refused to participate in the talks for this very reason. At the end, most of the countries participating in the congress concluded that Moscow should have a voice and be included in the peace process. During the Summit that ended yesterday, the main topic of discussion was the Ukrainian peace formula.

Read more in PostPravda:
Peace in Ukraine. Does the Summit in Switzerland have a chance of achieving anything?
Would Donald Trump bomb Moscow?

the peace summit

Hot this week

Ukraine’s soldiers seek revenge against Putin’s forces in Kursk: ‘We laughed digging trenches on enemy soil’

From crippling bridges bringing supplies to Russia’s troops to defending the territory they have snatched in daring raids, soldiers resting in Ukraine’s border Sumy region tell Askold Krushelnycky they want to push on.

Propaganda surrounding the assassination attempt on Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico

After the assassination attempt on Robert Fico, the propaganda inherent in such cases was basically immediately launched. Wszelaka. We followed it through.

In Kursk, Putin is learning that historical revanchism cuts both ways [OPINION]

Ukrainians may decide to celebrate the liberation of their former capital. Historical revanchism cuts both ways.

The Kremlin fears that the West is trying to break Russia apart. If only! [OPINION]

Russia’s stony-faced foreign minister is getting paranoid. Sergei Lavrov believes that “at present, about 50 countries are trying to break up Russia.” The West is the Kremlin's worst enemy.

In Russia, they conscripted a student for criticizing Joseph Stalin

In Russia, they conscripted a student into the army for criticizing Stalin. "He wanted an argument about Stalin? Well, he lost," - reads the Russian press.

The Aggressive Political Myth of the Kremlin Is More Than Just Fake News and Disinformation

The aggressive political myth used to justify war – not only against Ukraine but against the entire Western civilization – penetrates much deeper into the public consciousness than Kremlin propaganda, disinformation, or fake news.

How does the Ideology of modern Russia differ from that of the Soviet Union?

If Soviet ideology was monolithic, the current ideology of the Russian authorities appears loose, combining seemingly incompatible elements – for example, the cultivation of the Soviet past alongside the idealization of Tsarist Russia. Nevertheless, Russian propaganda has shown significant success, attracting a wide range of political forces, sometimes even those hostiles to each other. This demonstrates that modern Russian ideology functions differently from the Soviet one

Life Under Shelling. Donbas 2014–2025. An Eyewitness’s Notes

War constantly changes its nature, and so does the life of people living under shelling. Only one thing remains unchanged – the constant threat of losing one’s home, being maimed, or killed. As an eyewitness, Nikolai Karpitsky gives an account of life in the Donbas frontline zone over the course of ten years.

“The ‘Seals’ and Bulgaria: Russian Disinformation. How the Myth of ‘Ukrainian Tourists’ Was Born [INVESTIGATION]

While browsing pro-Kremlin media, I come across reports about Ukrainian refugees who supposedly refuse to leave Bulgaria’s luxurious Black Sea resorts — and I discover that similar stories (about Ukrainian refugees in Baltic resorts) are also appearing in Poland, mainly on social media and in nationalist pamphlets.

Russia’s Preparations for War with NATO: Hate Speech, Drones over Europe, Sabotage, and Disinformation [REPORT]

Russia is accelerating the informational and psychological phase of its preparations for a potential future war with NATO, experts from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) warn.

Russian Oil Refineries Under Ukrainian Fire: A Map of Strikes from the Past Year. Is Russia Falling to Its Knees?

In recent months, Ukraine has intensified its attacks on Russian oil refineries, leading to fuel shortages and rising prices in some regions of the Russian Federation. Since the beginning of 2025, 21 out of 38 major Russian facilities that process crude oil into fuels such as gasoline and diesel have been hit.

Russians Damaged the Power Supply to the Chernobyl Nuclear Plant. Reactors Near Zaporizhzhia Are Also in Trouble

Power supply problems have arisen at the Chernobyl plant after a Russian attack on the nearby town of Slavutych. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reassures that electricity has already been partially restored, though not everywhere.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img