Andrij Veselowski: India, China, Russia and Ukraine. “Are there reasons for the war to continue” [COLUMN]

After winning the presidential election, Donald Trump has consistently demonstrated his intention to end the war between Russia and Ukraine. Obviously, this cannot be done without an agreement with China, one of the world’s largest powers, on which Russia is completely dependent. That is why analysts are now focused on US-China relations, but they forget that there is another country comparable in power to China – India.

It is the world’s largest nuclear power by population, with its own cosmic programm, the fifth largest economy in the world, an advanced country in the field of information technology, with a huge diaspora in the United States that plays an important role in American science and technology centers. However, political observers, analysts, and journalists ignore it. This may be because India has traditionally pursued a policy of neutrality and non-interference in other countries, but this does not make its position on the world stage any less important. This is understood by Ukrainian scholars from the National Institute for Strategic Studies and the Institute of Oriental Studies, who, after Donald Trump’s victory in the US election, initiated an online discussion with their Indian colleagues and partners from the Indian think tank Synergia Foundation (Bengaluru, Karnataka).

At the meeting, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Ukraine to the Arab Republic of Egypt (2001-2005), the Republic of Sudan (2002-2005) and the Republic of Kenya (2002-2003), as well as Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the EU (2008-2010) Andriy Veselovsky proposed to expand the optics of India’s relations with Russia and Ukraine in the future, taking into account the policies to be implemented by the new US President. His Excellency presented an unbiased analysis of political interests, which should help India-Ukraine cooperation move from the realm of good wishes to the realm of pragmatism.  Now that Donald Trump has taken office, we can look again at his report, which he provided to PostPravda, to better understand what strategy we need to choose in the field of international cooperation.

Andriy Veselovsky. Looking through wider optics

In the middle of November, 2024 I was proposed to present a down-to-earth vision on the possible developments around the Russian-Ukrainian war of 2022-2024. I made a tough though realistic foresight which may happen or may not, significantly depending on us. Recently Donald Trump of the United States emboldened retired general Keith Kellog to be Assistant to the President and Special Envoy on Ukraine and Russia. Does it call for corrections to my previous conclusions?

Yes, to some degree. Unlike other pretenders to the position, such as diplomat Richard Grenell or some lawyer Epstein, the general is really tough and straightforward. He would be demanding towards Ukraine, which Kyiv has but to swallow, and he would be grueling towards Russia, which may irritate Putin, which, then, may irritate Trump, which, in the end, may provoke labelling Moscow the “Evil Empire” as President Reagan once coined, and press Russia to the end.

When back to our business, let me stress the evidence: India is an important global player, which may, collectively, with other mature states, work for the quickest termination of the hostilities and reach just settlement, punishing the aggressor Russia and rewarding the victim Ukraine.

The question is: why would India do it? What is her national interest – to fan the war, or to extinguish the war?

One may go indignant: war is a mortal sin! War ruins people’s lives and civilization!

One is right, still, wars exist, which means that they are profitable, and this Russian-Ukrainian one, too.

In fact, there are reasons to keep the war going and support Russia.

It is known that due to the international sanctions for the aggressive war Russia has to sell the export products with huge discounts, sometimes secretly. Big buyers of Russia’s oil, India in part, make money from it.

Being debilitated by the war, Moscow grudgingly opens the internal market to foreign goods and services, accepting rupees and yuan instead of US dollars.

India maintains traditional relations with Russia in the military field. She’s watching carefully how Russian armament works in the real war circumstances. The conclusion is obvious: one may pay less for it, it’s not as effective as the seller declares.

Na zdj. Prezydent Ukrainy i Premier Indii na wspólnym spotkaniu składają kwiaty w miejscu pamięcu poległych podczas trwającej obecnie wojny rosyjsko-ukraińskiej
In the photo: The President of Ukraine and the Prime Minister of India at a joint meeting lay flowers at a memorial site in honor of those who have fallen during the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, photo by Ukraine Presidential Office.

There are other examples of the kind

From the opposite, there are reasons to stop the war and make efforts to support Ukraine.

It’s a European country of 40 millions, with vibrant democracy, market economy and brave nationalist-minded people. Has a sizable muslim population, boasts several national and language minorities at the borders. Was a colony of an Empire for 350 years. Got independence 35 years ago. Looks like an India in a reduced size.

Quazy-member of the European Union, looking for NATO membership. Traditionally friendly to the Global South, India in particular.

Ukrainians have shown courage and ingenuity when confronting much bigger Russia. They invented drones as an armament. Having no boats, they reduced by half the Russian fleet in the Black Sea. There is a lot to learn if not buy from them in the military sphere.

One may also learn from them in science and technology. Some 40 thousand Indian students used to be the largest nation in the Ukrainian universities before the war. They felt safe and proud in Ukraine; no hatred, no chauvinism.

Ukrainian Black Sea ports provide the best access to the Indian goods for the Central Eastern Europe states. The biggest one in Odessa is that from where most of Ukrainian vegetable oil comes to India and most of the famous Indian tea arrives.

Reaching just peace in Ukraine means reducing the threat of war in the future for all. The case of Russian aggression, if goes unpunished, would provoke aggressive behaviour elsewhere. Why not try to carve a piece of a neighbor’s land if he is weaker? India knows well about attempts to cut her territory or to foment unfriendliness in neighboring States and Islands.

Last, but not least, Ukraine’s story would be incomplete without mentioning non-proliferation of the nuclear armament. India is a proud bulwark of that policy. One of the reasons why Russia dared to invade Ukraine was the rendition of the Ukrainian nuclear armament in 1995 and joining the NPT Treaty as a non-nuclear state. Many nations think heavily now about starting fabricating their own nuclear arsenal, to protect themselves, not like Ukraine did. To revert this dangerous trend one has to revert Russia back to her borders.

To be on the side of war, of aggressor, or to help the offended and restore justice, it’s a sovereign right of every nation. To support Ukraine means to invest in a more stable, predictable and just world. To stop Russia means not only to restart profitable diamond trade, but to prevent increasing hostilities, larger conflicts with global implications and, possibly, to push Moscow to rethink their fatal policy. India is too big and powerful to be shy.

Andrij Veselowski: India, China, Russia and Ukraine. “Are there reasons for the war to continue” [COLUMN]

Hot this week

Ukraine’s soldiers seek revenge against Putin’s forces in Kursk: ‘We laughed digging trenches on enemy soil’

From crippling bridges bringing supplies to Russia’s troops to defending the territory they have snatched in daring raids, soldiers resting in Ukraine’s border Sumy region tell Askold Krushelnycky they want to push on.

Propaganda surrounding the assassination attempt on Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico

After the assassination attempt on Robert Fico, the propaganda inherent in such cases was basically immediately launched. Wszelaka. We followed it through.

In Kursk, Putin is learning that historical revanchism cuts both ways [OPINION]

Ukrainians may decide to celebrate the liberation of their former capital. Historical revanchism cuts both ways.

The Kremlin fears that the West is trying to break Russia apart. If only! [OPINION]

Russia’s stony-faced foreign minister is getting paranoid. Sergei Lavrov believes that “at present, about 50 countries are trying to break up Russia.” The West is the Kremlin's worst enemy.

I’ve witnessed first-hand the horrific cost of Putin’s war – as casualties hit 1 million

The combined number of casualties on both sides in Russia’s war against Ukraine has reached the ghastly 1 million mark, according to a media report. The tally of deaths in Europe’s largest conflict since the Second World War.

Russian Imperial Consciousness and the Loss of an Adequate Perception of Probability

Why do Russians believe in absurd things? What seems unlikely in the world-picture of a Westerner appears inevitable in the world-picture of Russians. The mistake made by Western analysts is that they look for a rational motivation behind the behavior of the Russian authorities. Russians, however, assess the significance of events differently and assign different probabilities to them, and this directly affects their imperial consciousness.

Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Oleksandr Syrskyi, and Mykhailo Drapatyi: Professionalism or Military Talent?

Ukraine now faces the challenge of reversing the course of the war during the transition to a new technological era, one that demands of the Commander-in-Chief not only experience and professionalism but also talent. Will Mykhailo Drapatyi be able to meet this challenge?

President of Kazakhstan Tokayev Delivered Putin a Message Written in Beijing

During talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday, July 25, in Omsk, Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev proposed freezing the war in Ukraine. However, Estonian publicist Andrei Kuzichkin believes that, in reality, Kazakhstan’s president was conveying a message to Putin from Xi Jinping. The question remains whether Putin is capable of interpreting it correctly – and there are serious doubts about that.

Technology Has Changed Warfare. Will Western Leaders Draw the Right Conclusions from Valerii Zaluzhnyi’s Analysis?

On July 8, 2026, another article by Valerii Zaluzhnyi was published. The central thesis of the article is that advances in military technology require a fundamental reassessment of conventional ideas about war, including the very concept of military victory. Are Western leaders, who bear responsibility for the fate of their nations, prepared to draw the necessary conclusions and rethink their strategic vision of war?

Is the State an Instrument of Law or an Apparatus of Violence? Russia, Poland, and Ukraine: Historical Contradictions Can Be Overcome, but Civilizational Ones Cannot

At the core of political conflicts between Poland and Ukraine lies a divergent understanding of history. However, these contradictions can be overcome if historical disputes are not politicized but are instead approached through a shared understanding of the state as an instrument of the legal system designed to ensure normal social life. Political contradictions with Russia, however, are fundamentally irreconcilable. Even if enlightened liberals were to come to power in Russia, they would not be able to change the historical fact that Russia developed as a militarized state whose essence is not law but a mechanism of violence.

Alexander Lukashenko: Putin’s hostage despot

Alexander Lukashenko, who ruled Belarus for nearly 32 years through extremist state terror is now trapped by inescapable forces. Between his economic and military dependence on Moscow and the existential threats from his own population, he finds his survival at the mercy of factors beyond his clutch.

National Identity and the Diplomatic Conflict Between Poland and Ukraine

Is the diplomatic conflict between Poland and Ukraine purely ideological, or is it rooted in questions of national identity? Dr. Yulia Fil, a culturologist, offers an academic answer free of political judgments.

Sexual Humiliation as an Instrument of Russian Military Policy

Only in relatively recent times in democratic countries have sexual relations come to be understood primarily as a sphere of personal freedom and individual choice. Such an approach is unacceptable to the contemporary Russian authorities, which in their attitude toward sexuality demonstrate not merely conservatism but a drive to revive the most primitive forms of social control. As a result, sexual humiliation becomes one of the instruments used to maintain the system of power and to mobilize society for war.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img